Large-scale research: from atomic bombs to citizen science
Horizons No 119
What’s a country to do with a spare ten billion? Bid to host the Olympic Games, finance a new airport? Build a hydroelectric dam, commission an aircraft carrier? How about a state-of-the-art space telescope?
Indeed, since the Second World War, politicians and society have regularly agreed to support pharaonic science projects, despite their exorbitant costs. That’s because Big Science makes us dream. It feeds into our desire for knowledge and dramatically demonstrates our ability to question nature in all its extremes.
Open to all disciplines
But most interestingly, there’s more to it than just that. There’s the astonishing success of ‘science diplomacy’, which has succeeded in fusing into joint scientific projects not only the political but also the financial commitment of many countries. Major research infrastructures are now tools also open to all disciplines, broadening the collaborative side of Big Science. This is a virtuous strategy, as the growing number of actors and possible benefits improves the chances of fresh funding: we’re no longer aiming only to observe black holes but also to improve health and protect the environment.
Colossal bureaucracy
In these high-tech projects, there’s a risk, however, that we confuse the tool and the goal. Of course, politics are inherent in any massive, multi-decade investment. There’s the colossal bureaucracy, the excessive promises and the pressure to achieve results. And the hazard is that scientists become managers and communicators bereft of their risk appetite and provocative thought.
Uncompromising sense of honesty
Nevertheless, there is hope, such as the example set by John Ellis of Cern. Back in 2007 – a year before the new LHC accelerator was to be inaugurated – he wrote in Nature that failing to observe the Higgs boson would actually be more interesting than confirming it. This was a bucket of cold water in the face of the politicians paying for the LHC, but for giant research projects to fulfil their true mission – to advance knowledge – they must protect what is at the heart of science: an uncompromising sense of honesty. Even, or especially, when it may not sit well with political decision-makers.
Downloads/links
Horizons
- Water bargaining
- Start-ups in business heaven
- The tourism of the future
- Peer Review: Evaluating the evaluation
- How the cash flows
- AI, the new research partner
- The limits of brain research
- Science in the parliament
- Cinema, fact and fiction
- Patient Data
- Better cities
- A transition in publishing
- Sports in the Lab
- In virtual space
- Diversity in the academy
- Lessons from the pandemic
- A smart future for food
- Getting creative against climate change
- Belief in science
- Beware of poison! How we deal with the chemicals in the world
- Taking a fresh look at school
- Researchers in crisis zones
- Rationalising emotion
- Large-scale research: from atomic bombs to citizen science
- Switzerland’s wild-west underground
- The impotence of experts
- The other side of video gaming
- Horizons: La science au tribunal
- Horizons: Whose economy?
- Horizons: Science ex machina
- At the end of life
- Horizons: Researching fairness
- Open up, science!
- Weapons: making, selling and using them
- Research rises in the East
- Horizons: Men, women and all the others
- Horizons: New paths for science
- Horizons: Humanities 2.0: a digital odyssey
- Horizons: Researchers in Politics !?!
- Horizons: The boundaries of science
- horizons 102
- horizons 101
- Horizons 100
- horizons 99
- horizons 98
- horizons 97
- horizons 96
- horizons 95
- horizons 93
- horizons 93
- horizons 92
- horizons 91
- horizons 90
- horizons 89
- horizons 88
- horizons 87
- horizons 85
- horizons 84
- horizons 83
- horizons 82
- horizons 81
- horizons 80
- horizons 79
- horizons 78
- horizons 77
- horizons 76
- horizons 75
- horizons 74
- horizons 73
- Horizonte 72
- Horizonte 71
- Environmental change and migration in developing countries
- horizons 69
- horizons 68
- horizons 67
- horizons 66